vector
OU Circle

Before midnight on December 31st, your gift to the Orthodox Union could go twice as far!

Donate today to make an impact.
No matter who you are, there is an OU for you!

OU Circle

I Would Like to Donate

Donate Now

Religious Development – Finding the Inner Self

hero image
siddur

I am embarrassed to say that I came across the notion of religious development relatively late in my career but I do remember when I had my epiphany. I vividly recall seeing a twelfth-grade girl davening one day at Shacharit with what seemed like great kavanah (intent), something she had been doing all year. But one day I also had a flashback to what she had been like both emotionally and religiously when she had been in the ninth grade. The contrast was stark. Suffice it to say that she no longer resembled the girl she had been when she first came into high school. What happened along the way?

My first inclination was to say that she had grown more “mature” or “serious” and clearly that happens to all kids in high school, and that indeed is the way my colleagues explained it when I asked them about it. But what particularly does that mean in religious terms? How does someone get more “mature?” Part of the answer clearly had to do with the home she came from and the peers whom she emulated, but it occurred to me that there was a process going on that was really much more profound and that it was one that had repeated itself with many students over the years. That is, it occurred to me that if kids develop in clear stages cognitively (there’s a reason we don’t teach trigonometry in the 3rd grade) and if kids develop in clear stages emotionally (think “he took my toy” versus “let’s talk about this”) and in clear stages morally (a young person will tell you something is wrong because you’ll get punished; an older person should be able to tell you it’s wrong because it’s just wrong) then maybe there are clear stages that kids need to go through religiously as well. This, in turn, started me on a quest through discussions and courses and libraries, a quest that I have not yet completed–but I’ve learned a lot along the way.

Interestingly, there hasn’t been a lot of social science literature on this topic until perhaps the last fifteen years or so. A study of databases during the last decade of the 90’s, for example, found that only about 1% of all articles dealt with the question of spirituality or spiritual development in children and adolescents (Benson, P. et al. (2003). Spiritual development in childhood and adolescence: Toward a field of inquiry. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3). 205–213).  Today that number has exploded, with whole books and journals dedicated to the topic.  Without going into details, it seems clear that my initial intuition was correct: there certainly are stages that we all go through religiously. Unfortunately, the details of what the differences are at each stage and at what age each stage begins are still being debated. But I believe that simply understanding that those stages exist can help us all become better parents and educators, as I will explain.

The notion that there is such a thing as development is ancient.  In one of the earliest and most famous descriptions about Jewish education, Chazal (the Rabbis) in Pirkei Avot 5:21 (Ethics of the Fathers) laid out a curriculum plan for parents and teachers:

“At five years old a person should study the Scriptures, at ten years for the Mishnah, at thirteen for the commandments, at fifteen for the Talmud…”

Of course there are two ways of looking at this prescription. The one is simply to say that there is a spiraled curriculum here wherein each stage is a prerequisite for the one that follows i.e. you need to learn the material chronologically. A firm basis in Chumash (Five Books of Moses) is a necessity for ultimately learning gemara (though you wouldn’t know it from many yeshivot today.)

The other way of learning this Mishnah, is to suggest that it’s not just about the material but about the learner. The curriculum represents the cognitive stages that humans go through such that we move from the more concrete learning (Chumash) to more abstract learning (which, parenthetically, might tell us something about what grades we should and should not be starting gemara study and what the goals of that study might be.)

The problem for our purposes, though, is that most of this seems directed toward intellectual/cognitive education. It seems less directed to affective or what we might call spiritual education. And part of the problem of Jewish education, certainly in schools, it seems to me, is that schools tend to be so intellectual! To be sure, there’s a reason they call us the People of the Book – we love books and Torah learning most of all. But if you were to ask me what Judaism is all about, I would be hesitant to say that it is only about book learning. Where is the education of the heart? Where is the teaching of faith, of making a connection with the Divine? What’s the spiraled curriculum for that?

We’ll explore that in the columns ahead.  In the meantime, take a moment and be your own social scientist and try to identify your own children’s stages of religious development–or your own for that matter. When were the major transition points in your own religious life? When did you notice changes begin in your children? What kinds of changes were they? Knowing the child is the first step in education, whether it is your own child or your own child within.

Please share your own thoughts and recollections at soulofparenting@gmail.com


Rabbi Dr. Jay Goldmintz has been a day school educator and administrator for more than thirty five years who currently teaches fulltime at Ma`ayanot Yeshiva High School. He is Educational Director of the Legacy 613 Foundation, runs tefillah education workshops for teachers and has served as an adjunct at Azrieli Graduate School. He is author of the Koren Ani Tefila Siddur series, winner of the 2014 National Jewish Book Award.

The words of this author reflect his/her own opinions and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Orthodox Union.